RCT IN DECIDUOUS TEETH

Home Forums Pedodontics RCT IN DECIDUOUS TEETH

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10944
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    The Europeans were the first to introduce pulpotomy procedure.
    1885 – Leptowski: introduced formalin as fixative and mummifying agent.
    1886 – Gold foil was used to cover the exposed vital pulp.
    1898 – Gysi: Introduced paraformaldehyde as a pulpotomy medicament.
    1904 – Buckley: Introduced formocresol for pulpotomy.
    1930 – Hermann: Introduced calcium hydroxide as calxyl for pulpotomy.
    1975 – S’Gravemade: used gluteraldehyde which replaced formocresol.
    1983 – Reumping et al: demonstrated the use of electrosurgery for pulpotomy.
    1985 – Shoji: used carbon dioxide laser in pulpotomy.
    1991 – Nakashima used bone morphogenic protein.
    1993 – Torabinejad: MTA was used
    CLASSIFICATION

    Pulpotomy can be classified according to treatment objectives (Don M. Ranly 1994).
    1.Devitalization pulpotomy (Mummification, cauterization)
    Formocresol pulpotomy
    Electrosurgical pulpotomy
    Laser pulpotomy
    2. Preservation (minimum devitalization, non inductive)
    Gluteraldehyde
    Ferric sulfate
    3. Regeneration (Inductive & Reperative)
    Calcium hydroxide
    Bone morphogenic protein
    Depending upon the size of exposure
    1. Partial pulpotomy (shallow, low level or Cvek’s pulpotomy)
    2. Cervical pulpotomy (deep, high level total or conventional pulpotomy)
    Classified depending upon the number of visits
    1. Single visit pulpotomy
    2. Multiple visit pulpotomy
    INDICATIONS

    Mechanically exposed vital primary teeth.
    Caries exposure in vital asymptomatic primary tooth
    In the treatment of pulpally involved primary teeth with clinical manifestations of inflammation confined to coronal pulp.
    In the treatment of pulpally involved permanent teeth with open apices and vital pulp.
    In the treatment of fracture permanent teeth with pulp exposure >1sqmm.

    CONTRAINDICATIONS

    Spontaneous pain
    Abnormal sensitivity to heat or cold / chronic pulpalgia
    Tenderness to percussion
    Swelling / sinus
    Pus or serous exudates at the exposure site
    Pathological mobility
    Uncontrolled hemorrhage from the amputated pulp stumps
    Pathological external root resorption
    Periapical or inter radicular radiolucency
    Internal root resorption
    Pulp calcification / constriction of pulp chamber
    MATERIALS USED BY DENTISTS

    Formocresol
    Gluteraldehyde
    Devitalizing paraformaldehyde paste
    Gysi paste
    Easlicks paraformaldehyde paste
    Paraform devitalizing paste
    Camphorated paramonochlorophenol
    Cresol
    Metacresyl acetate
    Oxypara
    N2 Compound
    Zinc oxide eugenol
    Ferric sulphate
    Calcium hydroxide
    Enriched collagen solution
    Collagen calcium phosphate gel
    Dimethyl subirridemate
    Tetrandrine
    Freeze dried bone
    Tricalcium phosphate

    #15962
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    520 permanent teeth with chronic periapical periodontitis were selected and divided randomly into tinidazole-dexamethasone-iodoform paste group (A group) and formocresol group (B group). The periapical signs and symptoms were recorded, radiographs were taken. After root canal preparation, the tinidazole-dexamethasone-iodoform paste was used as an intracanal dressing medication for one week in A group and the formocresol paper point was used in B group. During the course of canal treatment, the clinical findings were assessed with clinical periapical index (CPI), the cases were followed up for two years.
    RESULTS:
    There was significant difference between A and B group (P<0.01), group A was better than group B. There was no significant difference between two groups of the success rate after following up two years (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSION:
    As an intra-canal sterilization medication,tinidazole-dexamethasone-iodoform can reduce the occurrence of endodontic interappointment emergencies in teeth with chronic periapical periodontitis and has a good long-term result.

     

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.