Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11042
    drmithila
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 242
    Replies: 579
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Today i came across a patient in the clinic , aged 75 years complaining of a swelling wrt bridge[33 to 37] in lower left region with no pain
    On examination it was found that the swelling was localised to 36, and right beneath the crown/bridge that was done atleast 10 years ago
    The swelling was present both lingually and buccally
    Since we suspected an infection erupting from the tooth under the crown as gingival recession was also seen, we took an IOPA but there was no sign of infection so an OPG was asked for.
    The OPG was normal, no bony lesion nor any sign of infection under the bridge. The 36 is not RC treated yet there is absolutely no sign of infection
    Also history was taken to rule out any drugs that could cause gingival enlargement but this kind of localised enlargement could not have been attributed to drugs

    This led us to narrow down our diagnosis to a fibrous growth stemming out of irritation to the gums by the crown margins of the old bridge

    We have referred the patient for second opinion
    KINDLY OPINE

    #16141
    siteadmin
    Offline
    Registered On: 07/05/2011
    Topics: 34
    Replies: 174
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

     was the swelling tender .

    can u post the clinical images/ IOPA/OPG.

    did u check for pockets. 

    regards,

    veeren

    #16142
    azeemaakbar@gmail.com
    Offline
    Registered On: 09/11/2012
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 2
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    yes since no radiographic changes or any other lesion was suspected,after 10 or 11 years the patient has come,which means there can be some chronic irritation underneath the restoration ,plus bacterial cause is also excluded,no infection,no fibrous dysplasia in bone,no periodontal involvement.

    second thing:biocompatibility of the material used can be questioned.success rate for a bridge is 10 to 12 years.

    #16145
    drmithila
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 242
    Replies: 579
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    1. The OPG is completely normal, no radiolucency indicative of any infection or lesion is visible

    2. No periodontal pockets, only gingival recession seen on mesial root, but still doesnt explain the lingual swelling

    3. We suspect the crown to be causing the irritation, so we will proceed with first removal of the crown

    #16153
    drsushant
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 253
    Replies: 277
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    I guess the diagnosis would be more apparent once you remove the crown. Do keep us updated on the case.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.