Dental implants can cause nerve damage, warns study

Home Forums Implantology Dental implants can cause nerve damage, warns study

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10604
    drsushant
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 253
    Replies: 277
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Dentists are not being vigilant when carrying out implant surgery and are failing to inform patients about the risks of nerve damage, a study in the British Dental Journal says.

    Researchers from King’s College London Dental Institute analysed 30 patients with nerve injuries and found problems with pain, speech, eating and kissing.

    Around 1% of implant procedures carried out each year result in nerve injuries.

    Dentists should improve care before and after implant surgery, the study says.

    A dental implant is an artificial tooth root, which is screw or cylinder-shaped, that is placed into the jaw to hold a replacement tooth or bridge.

    Dental implants are generally used if someone has lost a tooth or teeth due to disease or injury.

    The type of nerve injury which can be caused by implant surgery has increased in recent years alongside a rise in implant surgery.

    Approximately 10,000 lower jaw implant procedures are performed each year in the UK.

    In 2007, 30% of all nerve injuries cause by dental work were associated with implants. This contrasts with 10% in 1997.

    The King’s College London research team found that these injuries could have a significant impact on people’s quality of life.

    More than half of the 30 patients participating in the research suffered constant pain or discomfort after surgery, with 40% complaining of numbness.

    Start Quote

    It is vital that patients understand the risks of this type of surgery.”

    Prof Tara RentonKing’s College London

    Thirty per cent of the implant injury patients reported psychological problems, including four who were diagnosed with depression.

    ‘Inadequate’

    Prof Tara Renton, lead study author from King’s College London Dental Institute, said the way patients were treated before and after implant surgery was not good enough.

    “It is vital that patients understand the risks of this type of surgery, and clinicians must improve their systems and procedures.

    “In our study of a collection of implant patients with injuries we discovered that pre-operative consent, planning and follow-up after surgery was inadequate.

    “Clinicians must be vigilant about potential nerve damage when carrying out these surgical procedures.”

    Prompt referral

    Of the 30 patients whose nerve injuries were analysed, only 11 were aware of signing consent forms before the implant surgery.

    Eight of those patients felt they were not warned about nerve injury.

    Seventy per cent of the 30 patients were referred to a specialist nerve injury clinic more than six months after surgery, despite evidence showing that removing implants soon after surgery reduces the risk of permanent damage.

    Only three patients were referred and able to be treated immediately after surgery.

    The research team recommended that clinicians give all patients adequate consent and made them aware of the risk of nerve damage.

    They also recommended using shorter implants to guard against the risk of nerve damage.

    Referral to a specialist nerve clinic should take place immediately and the implants should be removed promptly, they said.

    ‘Fully informed’

    Prof Damien Walmsley, scientific adviser at the British Dental Association, said surgery was not risk-free.

    “It is essential that patients considering having dental implants are made aware of the risks, as well as benefits, associated with this procedure.

    “The risk of nerve damage will vary according to where an implant is inserted in the mouth, but dentists take the precautions necessary to minimise this risk and achieve a successful outcome.

    “Dentists must ensure that their patients are fully informed and understand what is involved so that they can provide informed consent.

    “It’s also important that patients attend all follow-up appointments to ensure that any problems identified are treated as early as possible.”

    #15595
    drmithila
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 242
    Replies: 579
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Advantages of Microimplants
    Use of these devices leads to:
    24 X 7 Force delivery
    simplified mechanics,
    improved results,
    drastic reduction (upto 40%) in treatment timing,
    reduction in number of extractions
    Minimal dependence on patient co operation
    Disadvantages of Microimplants
    High Cost of the devices
    Failure of about 10% fixures
    Problem in site selection in patients with poor Bone quality
    Patient acceptance may be an issue in some cultures
    Common Indications for placement of Temporary Anchorage devices/mini implants
    Every case is not suited for microimplants. Minimal anchorage cases now can be treated non extraction with MI, many other average extraction cases we found that treatment objectives are achieved and extraction space is still remaining. Hence the cases where you need molars to come forward to occupy some of the ext space, are better done without MI or done with caution.
    Mini implants are used most beneficially where three dimensional stable anchorage is needed, some of these situations are:
    Where you can not afford any movement of reactive units (maximum anchorage case)
    Patient with several missing teeth making it difficult to engage posterior units
    For difficult tooth movements, eg intrusion of anterior and posterior segments and ditalisation
    Where asymmetrical tooth movement is needed
    To treat borderline cases with non extraction method
    Doing extreme ortho when patient is not willing to undergo orthognathic surgery
    Common SITES OF PLACEMENT-see pic below
    MAXILLA:
    Infrazygomatic crest area.
    Tuberosity area.
    Between 1st and 2nd molars buccally.
    Between 1st molar and 2nd premolar buccally.
    Between canine and premolar buccally.
    Between incisors facially.
    Mid palatal Area.
    MANDIBLE:
    Retromolar Area.
    Between 1st and 2nd molars buccally.
    Between 1st molar and 2nd premolar buccally.
    Between canine and premolar buccally.

     

    #15596
    drmithila
    Offline
    Registered On: 14/05/2011
    Topics: 242
    Replies: 579
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.