effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of i

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 29/12/2010 at 2:01 pm by Anonymous.

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
03/12/2010 at 11:25 am #9780

tirath
Offline
Registered On: 31/10/2009
Topics: 353
Replies: 226
Has thanked: 0 times
Been thanked: 0 times

The choice of material used for a provisional restoration significantly influences the vertical displacement of implants placed in artificial bone. When loads are applied to distal cantilevers, load distribution with metal reinforcement seems more favorable than with unreinforced acrylic resin

29/12/2010 at 2:01 pm #14416

Anonymous

MATERIALS USED AS TEMPORARY CROWNS OR BRIDGES:

Polycarbonates
Cellulose acetate
Aluminium
Tin-silver
Nickel-chromium
Author

Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.