EFFECT OF SMOKING ON THE ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS OF PERIOD

Home Forums Periodontology EFFECT OF SMOKING ON THE ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS OF PERIOD

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9282
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    EFFECT OF SMOKING ON THE ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS OF PERIODONTAL DISEASE

    Microbiology:

    It has been shown that smokers have a greater extent of colonization by periodontal pathogens (harmful bacteria) than non smokers or former smokers and that this colonization may lead to increased prevalence of periodontal destruction.

    Immunology:
    Smoking exerts a major effect on the protective elements of immune response, resulting in an increase in the extent and severity of periodontal destruction (gums and supporting structures being destroyed). According to numerous studies, smoking may impair the response of neutrophils to periodontal infection but may also increase the release of tissue destructive enzymes.

    In studies done by Eichel B, Sharik HA in 1969 and by Kenney EB and Kraal JH in 1977, smoking has been shown to impair the chemotaxis and phagocytosis of neutrophils (body’s protective soldiers) obtained from the oral cavity.

    In addition to above, in vitro studies done by Codd EE and Swim AT in 1987, Kalra J & Chaudhary AK in 1991 and by Lannan S & McLean A in 1992, the effects of tobacco products on neutrophils have shown detrimental effects on cell movement and the oxidative burst.

    Moreover it was shown by Gunsolley SG & Zambon J in 1997 and Quinn SM & Zhang JB in 1998 that IgG2 levels to periodontal pathogens are reduced in smokers than in non – smokers with periodontitis suggesting that smokers may have reduced protection against periodontal infection.

    #16465
    drsnehamaheshwari
    Offline
    Registered On: 16/03/2013
    Topics: 110
    Replies: 239
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
    Smokers have a richer population of microbes associated with periodontal disease than nonsmokers, according to research presented at the recent International Association for Dental Research (IADR) meeting in Seattle.
    Matthew Mason, an oral biology graduate student at the Ohio State University College of Dentistry, described the efforts he and his co-investigators undertook to compare and characterize the oral microbial fingerprints of 100 smokers and 100 nonsmokers selected at random from the Columbus, OH, community.
    The participants were both periodontally and dentally healthy, had no known systemic diseases, and had not received a professional dental cleaning or antibiotics in the previous 90 days.
    The researchers took small samples of the subgingival plaque in the individuals and isolated the DNA in the samples. They then amplified the DNA and sequenced it. Next, they determined the genus and species of the microbes represented by the DNA and generated a phylogenetic tree and a microbial fingerprint for smokers and nonsmokers.
    A phylogenetic tree is a depiction of a group of species and how they are related to one another, with the broad classifications (phylum, class, and order) in the center and more specific classifications (family, genus, and species) in branches radiating outward.
    The results showed that both the smokers and nonsmokers had approximately 270 species of microbes in their mouths. Most of the species were present in somewhat different concentrations in the smokers versus nonsmokers. Overall, the microbial fingerprints of smokers do not overlap very much with the fingerprints of nonsmokers, the investigators found.
    More pathogenic species
    The team then performed a more detailed analysis of the abundance of 9 microbial species in each person’s mouth to better define the differences between smokers’ and nonsmokers’ oral microbiomes. The results revealed that nonsmokers’ mouths harbored larger concentrations of 3 types of microbes associated with oral health: Streptococcus phocae, Neisseria, and Haemophilus parainfluenzae.
    In contrast, smokers’ mouths were home to larger numbers of 6 other groups implicated in periodontal disease: Veillonella parvula, Filifactor, Lactobacillus, Fusobacterium, Aeromicrobium, and Desulfobulbus.
    "Being a smoker is enriching the community of disease-associated organisms even in a state of clinical health," commented Mason.
    In the final step in the study, the researchers looked at whether an individual’s microbial fingerprint could be used to tell whether that person is a smoker or nonsmoker. They found that there is a true-positive probability of about 85% for predicting whether someone is a smoker based on the DNA profile.
    The investigators now hope to look at other possible determinants of the oral microbial colonization, including age, gender, and genetics, and the effects of other factors such as ethnicity and obesity.

    "Universally applying microbial replacement therapy to all individuals such as by using broad-spectrum antibiotics may not always be the best course of treatment without thinking about what an individual’s microbial fingerprint is predicted to be in health," noted Mason. 

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.