FURCATION DEFECTS

Home Forums Periodontology FURCATION DEFECTS

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11772
    Anonymous
    Online
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 1149
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 1 time

    In dentistry, a furcation defect is a term used to describe bone loss, usually a result of periodontal disease, affecting the base of the root trunk of a tooth where two or more roots meet. The extent and configuration of the defect are factors in both diagnosis and treatment planning.[1]

    Because of its importance in the assessment of periodontal disease, a number of methods of classification have evolved to measure and record the severity of furcation involvement; most of the indices are based on horizontal measurements attachment loss in the furcation.

    Grade I – Incipient furcation involvement, with any associated pocketing remaining coronal to the alveolar bone; primarily affects the soft tissue. Early bone loss may have occurred but is rarely evident radiographically.
    Grade II – There is a definite horizontal component to the bone loss between roots resulting in a probeable area, but bone remains attached to the tooth so that multiple areas of furcal bone loss, if present, do not communicate.
    Grade III – Bone is no longer attached to the furcation of the tooth, essentially resulting in a through-and-through tunnel. Because of an angle in this tunnel, however, the furcation may not be able to be probed in its entirety; if cumulative measurements from different sides equal or exceed the width of the tooth, however, a grade III defect may be assumed. In early grade III lesions, soft tissue may still occlude the furcation involvement, though, making it difficult to detect.
    Grade IV – Essentially a super grade III lesion, grade IV describes a through-and-through lesion that has sustained enough bone loss to make it completely probeable.
    In 2000, Fedi, et al. modified Glickman’s classification to include two degrees of a grade II furcation defect:[3]

    Grade II degree I – exists when furcal bone loss possesses a vertical component of >1 but <3mm.
    Grade II degree II – exists when furcal bone loss possesses a vertical component of >3mm, but still does not communicate through-and-through.
    In 1975, Sven-Erik Hamp, together with Lindhe and Sture Nyman, classified furcation defects by their probeable depth.

    Class I – Furcation defect is less than 3 mm is depth.
    Class II – Furcation defect is at least 3 mm in depth (and thus, in general, surpassing half of the buccolingual thickness of the tooth) but not through-and-through (i.e. there is still some interradicular bone attached to the angle of the furcation. The furcation defect is thus a cul-de-sac.
    Class III – Furcation defect encompassing the entire width of the tooth so that no bone is attached to the angle of the furcation.[3]

    #16926
    tirath
    Offline
    Registered On: 31/10/2009
    Topics: 353
    Replies: 226
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    furcation involvement can be checked by nabers probe

    #16927
    Anonymous

    What effect does furcation involvement have on root canal treatment? will the root canal fail?

    #16931
    Anonymous

    Furcation involvement is one of the most important criteria for prognosis determination.
    if furcation involvement identify by whatever method treatment for that should define in proper way because if treatment is not proper than outcome of that treatment is compromised.
    in case of maxillary molar the prevalence of furcation involvement is most common.

    #16933
    Anonymous

    So one should avoid treating a tooth of furaction involvement?
    Extraction is the only option?
    How successful are bone grafts in such cases??

    #16978
    tonyshori.perio
    Offline
    Registered On: 18/03/2011
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 20
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Grade II furcation are best treated by regenerative procedures. Its prognosis is quite good. For Grade III, IV there procedures such as hemisection, root resection, bicucspidization and tunnelling procedures

    #16981
    Payal
    Offline
    Registered On: 27/02/2011
    Topics: 1
    Replies: 4
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    In teeth with furcation defects and endodontic lesions we are looking at a endo – perio lesion which may or may not be combined.If the lesion is combined overall prognosis for tooth is poor. If the lesions are two separate entities , rct will take care of the endo lesion. The furcation defect depending on the grade needs perio therapy ranging from non surgical maintenence , regeneration in Class 2 mandibular to other resective procedures.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.