Improving Proximal Contours for Direct Resin Restorations

Home Forums Endodontics & conservative dentistry Improving Proximal Contours for Direct Resin Restorations

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12328
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    One of the most challenging aspects of direct posterior resin restorations is achieving good proximal contacts with proper contours. This can become especially challenging when the resulting proximal preparation is wide and the adjacent tooth leaves a large space interproximally.

    PROXIMAL CONTACT GOALS
    The goals of posterior direct restorations include (1) tight contact with the adjacent tooth’s proximal surface, (2) contour gingival to the contact that fills the space without food traps, and (3) buccal/lingual contours that prevent food impaction interproximally.
    These goals often are not met routinely as circumferential matrices tend to constrict the buccal and lingual contours, resulting in inadequate contacts and poor anatomical form.Sectional matrix and ring retainers were introduced in an attempt to combat this and to allow the practitioner to achieve better contacts and contours. But, those also had some challenges when the proximal preparation resulted in a box that extended to include a portion of the buccal and lingual walls, or space was present between the tooth being treated and the adjacent tooth. The proximal tines of most rings would jump into the preparation and have no tooth structure against which to brace. This would result in a constricted contact and narrowed anatomy of the restoration.

    TECHNICAL ASPECTS IMPROVE RINGS

    The newest generation rings, such as the V3 Ring (Triodent), were developed to overcome the negatives of the prior rings available. These rings have wider tines that are able to contact more tooth structure, even when preparation has eliminated portions of the buccal and lingual cusps interproximally, or when there is a greater distance with the adjacent tooth. As with its predecessor (V Ring [Triodent]), the tines are designed to straddle the wedge instead of sitting adjacent to it, making placement easier (Figure 1). The added benefit is that proximal separation is greater, making for a tighter final contact. As all teeth are not created equal, no single ring is ideal for every situation, and what fits a molar proximal may not be ideally suited for a premolar contact. With that in mind, 2 different sized V3 Rings were designed; a green for molar contacts and a yellow for premolar contacts (Figure 2). An added improvement from the original ring design is that the tines have an increased angle to the ring’s loop to make stacking the rings for placement on adjacent proximals easier when both the mesial and distal will be restored on the same tooth (Figure 3).
    A typical clinical situation involves the need to restore both proximal surfaces on the same tooth. This can be challenging, especially when caries removal requires more of the interproximal to be removed. The goal in today’s restorative dentistry is to conserve as much tooth structure as possible and only remove carious dentin and enamel. However, this can still result in challenges when restoring the interproximal surfaces.

    #17535
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
    #17536
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    CASE REPORT

    The patient presented with an open contact between the first and second molars with resulting interproximal caries as a result of chronic food impaction. Following caries removal, it was noted that the distal box was relatively wide, but the mesial box preparation was narrow due to the minimal caries in this area (Figure 4). Sectional matrices were placed at both the mesial and distal of the tooth to be restored. A small wedge (pink) was placed at the mesial, and a large (purple) distally. Triodent V3 rings were placed at both the interproximals (Figure 5).
    The preparation was rinsed and lightly dried to eliminate any pooled water. A solvent-free self-etch adhesive (Bond1-SF [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) was vigorously rubbed into the prepared dentin and enamel surfaces for 20 seconds (Figures 6 and 7). The resulting surface should have a glistening appearance (Figure 8): once this was visually verified, it was light-cured for 10 seconds (Figure 9).
    A layer of dentin shade B3 nanocomposite (Artiste Nano Composite [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) was adapted to the pulpal floor, proximal boxes, and over all prepared dentin surfaces. Lobes were formed and pits/fissures developed with a cone burnisher (PKT-3R, Zoll Dental), then light-cured (Figures 10 and 11).
    To replicate a more natural aesthetic appearance, a brown tint (Artiste Maverick posterior pit tint [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) was applied with a No. 8 endodontic hand file to the pits and fissures created in the dentin layer of composite. This was then light-cured (Figure 12).
    A layer of shade B enamel nanocomposite (Artiste Nano Composite [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) was placed over the dentin composite, using an acorn burnisher (21B [Zoll Dental]) to adapt it and to create the desired anatomy (Figure 13). The restoration was light-cured from the buccal, then the lingual, and finally the occlusal surfaces (Figure 14). The restoration was now ready for finishing and polishing (Figure 15).

    Next, the rings, wedges, and matrix were removed (Figure 16). As the proximal contacts are often very tight as a result of using this ring system, it may be necessary to use a locking hemostat to remove the matrix. Needle-shaped finishing carbides (ETS 8.5 [Brasseler USA]) and diamonds were used to remove any flash on the buccal and lingual. This was followed by football-shaped carbides (H379F [Brasseler USA]) and diamonds (D051 379F [Brasseler USA]) to contour the cavosurface margin (Figure 17). Final polishing was performed with polishing disks (Fini [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) followed by polishing paste (Fini Polishing paste [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) on a felt point (Felt buff polisher [Pentron Clinical Technologies]) (Figure 18).

    CONCLUSION
    Posterior direct resin restorations can be accomplished with excellent proximal contours and tight contacts by using well-designed rings, matrices, and wedges. This, in combination with a simple layering technique using modern nanocomposite resin materials, allows the dentist to mimic the aesthetics and anatomy found in nature.

    #17537
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    refer the attached document for figures..

    #17543
    Anonymous

    i feel that this needs a skill also

    #17544
    Anonymous

    When restoring Class II adhesive restorations in children, teenagers, and adults, the goal is to provide 1) tight contacts, 2) good contours, and 3) proper anatomy. There are many types of matrices on the market, however, in restoring thousands of restorations in children and teenagers, I have found that segmental metal matrices provide for all three goals. The purpose of this article is to review several previously published articles and illustrate several examples of available matrices.

    T-bands The T-bands that provide the best contacts are the .001 inch brass matrices. These bands can provide quick and easy matrices, and I use them for children and teenagers. I prefer the straight (vs. curved) narrow T-bands for primary teeth. These bands are used with wedges and provide tight contacts for Class II restorations in young children.

    Omni-matrix The Omni-matrix? (Ultradent Corp.) has several advantages over the classic Tofflemire? retainer. The Omni-matrix has both pediatric and adult sizes and has the advantage of using metal or mylar strips.

    Sectional matrices with separation rings According to Loomans, B.A., et al: “The use of sectional matrices combined with separation rings resulted in tighter proximal contacts compared to when circumferential systems were used.”2 I have found this to be true in both primary and permanent teeth when restoring Class II resin composite, compomer, resin-modified glass ionomers, and glass ionomer materials.

    #17545
    Anonymous

    Proper placement of amalgam requires condensation by applying strong
    pressure to the surface of the amalgam with amalgam pluggers. In cavities involving
    more than one tooth surface, it is usually necessary to surround the tooth with a matrix
    band to help confine the restorative material to the cavity preparation during
    condensation. The matrix band also helps determine proper contours and the location
    and form of proximal contacts in the restored tooth. A number of types of matrix retainers
    are available. Many are designed to be used with matrix bands premade in assorted
    sizes and configurations. Matrix bands may also be tailored individually from matrix band
    material and tied or otherwise held in place on the tooth. When the matrix is in place on
    the tooth, a wedge or wedges are often used to hold the band tightly against the neck of
    the tooth on proximal surfaces involved in the cavity preparation (see figure 2-30). The
    wedge keeps the amalgam from squeezing out under the matrix band and into the
    interproximal space or spaces. Some dental officers use red or green stick impression
    compound to add further support and rigidity to the matrix.

    (2) The assistant, with the dental officer, will prepare materials designed to
    replace the missing walls of a cavity preparation and to shape or protect the restoration.
    Placing a matrix for an amalgam restoration will allow the dental officer to insert the
    restorative material without exceeding the limits of the normal tooth structure. The most
    common type is the Tofflemire matrix retainer and band. This comes in two parts–a small
    stainless steel band that encircles the tooth and the instrument that holds the band in
    place (called the Tofflemire retainer). Note that the number 1 Universal band is doubled
    over when it is placed in the retainer. In assembling and placing the matrix, there are
    three essential rules to follow. First, the small opening of the band must point toward the
    cervical portion or root of the tooth. Secondly, the slotted side of the retainer always
    points toward the root of the tooth to facilitate the removal of the retainer after the
    restorative material has partially set or crystallized. Finally, the retainer is usually
    positioned on the facial side of the tooth being worked on (in the vestibule).

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.