Indices of Difficulty in Removing of 3rd Molars

Home Forums Oral & Maxillofacial surgery Indices of Difficulty in Removing of 3rd Molars

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #12377
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Classification of impacted 3rd molars is often an attempt in
    defining the degree of difficulty of removal; this is generally
    based on 4 commonly used classifications of third molars,
    which are defined by angulation, impaction, application
    depth & eruption.

    Assessment of difficulty of 3rd molar surgery is
    fundamental to forming an optimal treatment plan in order
    to minimise complications.

    A compilation of both clinical and radiological information is
    necessary to make an intelligent estimate of the time
    required to remove a tooth and also whether the removal
    should be done in the dental surgery or a more specialised
    setting (such as a specialist clinic or hospital). Leading on
    from this is whether the tooth extraction would be better
    done under LA, LA Sedation or GA.

    The various extraction difficulty indices include the following:

    Pell–Gregory classification
    Pederson scale
    Parant scale
    Winter’s Lines (WAR)
    WHARFE Scale.

    Various studies have shown that the Pell–Gregory scale,
    which is widely cited in textbooks of oral surgery, is not
    reliable for the prediction of operative difficulty.

    Pederson proposed a modification of the Pell–Gregory
    scale that included a 3rd factor, the angulation of the molar
    (mesio-angular, horizontal, vertical or disto-angular). The
    Pederson scale is designed for evaluation of dental X-rays
    (such as DPT’s / OPG’s).

    Although the Pederson scale can be used for predicting
    operative difficulty, it is not widely used because it does
    not take various relevant factors into account, such as
    bone density, flexibility of the cheek and buccal opening.
    The Pederson scale is used in prediction of pre-operative
    difficulties. On the other hand, the modified Parant scale
    was implemented to predict post-operative difficulties.

    Pre-operative Pederson scale (easy, moderate or difficult)
    and post-operative Parant scale (easy or difficult
    [III or IV]).

    Winter’s Lines (WAR)

    The position & depth of the mandibular 3rd molar can be
    determined using the Winter’s Lines (WAR). These are 3
    imaginary lines (red, amber & white) “drawn” on the dental
    X-ray (these days, normally an OPG / DPT).

    White Line

    The white line is drawn along the occlusal surfaces of the
    erupted mandibular molars & extended over the 3rd molar
    posteriorly. It indicates the difference in occlusal level of
    the 1st & 2nd molars & the 3rd molar.

    Amber Line

    The amber line represents the (height of the) bone level.
    The amber line is drawn from the surface of the bone on
    the distal aspect of the 3rd molar (or from the ascending
    ramus) to the crest of the inter-dental septum twixt the 1st
    & 2nd molars. This line denotes the margin of the alveolar
    bone covering the 3rd molar and gives some indication to
    the amount of bone that will need to be removed for the
    tooth to come out.

    Red Line

    The red line is an imaginary line drawn perpendicular from
    the amber line to an imaginary point of application of an
    elevator. Usually, this is the cemento-enamel junction on
    the mesial aspect of the impacted tooth (unless, it is the
    disto-angular impacted tooth where the application point
    is the distal cemento-enamel junction). The red line
    indicates the amount of bone that will have to be removed
    before elevation of the tooth i.e. the depth of the tooth in
    the jaw & the difficulty encountered in removing the tooth.

    With each increase in length of the red line by 1mm, the
    impacted tooth becomes 3 x more difficult to remove (as
    opined by Howe). If the red line is < 5mm, than the tooth
    can be removed under just LA; anything above, a GA or
    LA Sedation would be more appropriate.

    #17614
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
    #17615
    drmittal
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2011
    Topics: 39
    Replies: 68
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Another method of judging the depth of the 3rd molar is to divide the root of the
    2nd molar into thirds. A horizontal line is drawn from the point of application for an
    elevator to the 2nd molar. If the point of application is adjacent to the coronal,
    middle or apical root third, then the tooth extraction is assessed as easy,
    moderate or difficult respectively.

    WHARFE Assessment

    The six factors chosen for scoring are:

    Winters classification
    Height of the mandible
    Angulation of the 2nd molar
    Root shape & morphology
    Follicle development
    Path of Exit of the tooth during removal

    The scoring by this system helps the beginners to anticipate problems and to avoid
    difficult impactions. Unfortunately, the disadvantage of this method is that it is
    related only to radiological features alone; the details of the surgical procedures
    are not considered. The total scoring is directly related corresponding difficulties in
    removing that impacted teeth.
    Assessment of difficulty of third molar surgery is fundamental to forming an optimal
    treatment plan in order to minimise complications. A compilation of both clinical
    and radiological information is necessary to make an intelligent estimate of the time
    required to remove a tooth and whether it would be better done just under LA or
    under LA Sedation or GA.

    There are a number of classifications / scales that try to be predictive of the
    extraction however each has its good and bad points.

    There has been an attempt to computerise the assessment of impacted 3rd
    molars. However good this is though, there is still the problem of whether the
    scale used is of any use or widely understood.

    The acid test for any of these classifications / scales is whether they are actually
    used in OMFS Departments or dental surgeries. From personal experience, they
    are not.

    #17616
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
    #17617
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Where the various classifications are not used, the following observations are more
    likely to be noted and acted upon.

    Factors that Make Surgery Less Difficult:

    Mesio-angular impaction
    Class 1 ramus
    Class A depth
    Roots 1/3 – 2/3 formed (present in the younger patient)
    Fused conical roots
    Wide periodontal ligament (present in the younger patient)
    Large follicle (present in the younger patient)
    Elastic bone (present in the younger patient)
    Separated from 2nd molar
    Separated from IDN
    Soft tissue impaction

    Factors that Make Surgery More Difficult:

    Disto-angular impaction
    Class 3 ramus
    Class C depth
    Long thin roots (present in the older patient)
    Divergent curved roots
    Narrow periodontal ligament (present in the older patient)
    Thin follicle (present in the older patient)
    Dense, inelastic bone (present in the older patient)
    Contact with 2nd molar
    Close to IDN
    Complete bony impaction.

    #17618
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times
    #17619
    Anonymous

    according to studies mesioangular is least difficult with most difficult being distoangular

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.