judging a quality of endo

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 07/08/2011 at 5:33 am by Anonymous.

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

Author

Posts
07/08/2011 at 5:33 am #12412

Anonymous
Online
Topics: 0
Replies: 1150
Has thanked: 0 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Instruments that stay intact independent of the shape of the canal being instrumented.
Instruments that do not distort the apical third of the canal.
Instruments that can be used many times, keeping costs down.
Instruments which are efficient in their use. (“Efficiency” being defined as the ability to negotiate to the apex with minimal resistance.)
Instruments that can differentiate between a solid wall and a tight canal.
Instruments that can differentiate between a round and oval canal.
Instruments that can be engine-driven to avoid hand fatigue.
Instruments that can do all the above while shaping canals to a sufficiently wide apical preparation and taper.
A system that is relatively easy to learn and master.
Author

Posts

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.