Home › Forums › Prosthetic dentistry › Prosthetic dentistry › QUERY
Welcome Dear Guest
To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10/11/2012 at 5:33 pm by drsushant.
-
AuthorPosts
-
08/11/2012 at 6:31 pm #11042drmithilaOfflineRegistered On: 14/05/2011Topics: 242Replies: 579Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times
Today i came across a patient in the clinic , aged 75 years complaining of a swelling wrt bridge[33 to 37] in lower left region with no pain
On examination it was found that the swelling was localised to 36, and right beneath the crown/bridge that was done atleast 10 years ago
The swelling was present both lingually and buccally
Since we suspected an infection erupting from the tooth under the crown as gingival recession was also seen, we took an IOPA but there was no sign of infection so an OPG was asked for.
The OPG was normal, no bony lesion nor any sign of infection under the bridge. The 36 is not RC treated yet there is absolutely no sign of infection
Also history was taken to rule out any drugs that could cause gingival enlargement but this kind of localised enlargement could not have been attributed to drugsThis led us to narrow down our diagnosis to a fibrous growth stemming out of irritation to the gums by the crown margins of the old bridge
We have referred the patient for second opinion
KINDLY OPINE08/11/2012 at 6:40 pm #16141siteadminOfflineRegistered On: 07/05/2011Topics: 34Replies: 174Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times09/11/2012 at 9:10 am #16142azeemaakbar@gmail.comOfflineRegistered On: 09/11/2012Topics: 0Replies: 2Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 timesyes since no radiographic changes or any other lesion was suspected,after 10 or 11 years the patient has come,which means there can be some chronic irritation underneath the restoration ,plus bacterial cause is also excluded,no infection,no fibrous dysplasia in bone,no periodontal involvement.
second thing:biocompatibility of the material used can be questioned.success rate for a bridge is 10 to 12 years.
09/11/2012 at 6:05 pm #16145drmithilaOfflineRegistered On: 14/05/2011Topics: 242Replies: 579Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times1. The OPG is completely normal, no radiolucency indicative of any infection or lesion is visible
2. No periodontal pockets, only gingival recession seen on mesial root, but still doesnt explain the lingual swelling
3. We suspect the crown to be causing the irritation, so we will proceed with first removal of the crown
10/11/2012 at 5:33 pm #16153drsushantOfflineRegistered On: 14/05/2011Topics: 253Replies: 277Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.