The effect of pumicing on the in vivo use of a resin modifie

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 17/12/2010 at 11:42 am by tirath.

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

Author

Posts
17/12/2010 at 11:42 am #9819

tirath
Offline
Registered On: 31/10/2009
Topics: 353
Replies: 226
Has thanked: 0 times
Been thanked: 0 times

Pumicing of the enamel prior to direct bonding with conventional diacrylate bonding agents has been shown to be unnecessary.\
Prior pumicing of the enamel has no effect on in vivo failure when using either a conventional diacrylate or a resin modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement. A greater number of bonds failed with the resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement.
Author

Posts

Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.