Home › Forums › Cosmetic & Aesthetic dentistry › What are Giomers
Welcome Dear Guest
To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com
- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15/07/2010 at 7:04 am by sushantpatel_doc.
-
AuthorPosts
-
12/07/2010 at 8:29 pm #9415tirathOfflineRegistered On: 31/10/2009Topics: 353Replies: 226Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times
Giomers are a relatively new type of restorative material. The name “giomer” is a hybrid of the words “glass ionomer” and “composite”, which pretty well describes what a giomer is claimed to be. Although glass-ionomer restorative materials such as Ketac-Fil (3M ESPE) and Fuji Type II (GC America) have some very important properties, such as fluoride release, fluoride rechargeability, and chemical bonding to tooth structure, they also have well-known shortcomings. Their esthetics, for example, are less than ideal and make them a poor second choice to resin composites for restoring esthetically-demanding areas. Also, they are sensitive to moisture contamination and desiccation, which can present the clinician with challenges during their placement. In the 1990s manufacturers improved these shortcomings by adding resins to glass ionomers to produce resin-modified glass ionomers. These products (e.g., Fuji II LC, GC America; Vitremer, 3M ESPE; Photac-Fil Quick, 3M ESPE) have much better esthetics and handling characteristics than glass ionomers. Importantly, they also retain many of the glass ionomer’s beneficial properties, such as long-term fluoride release and the ability to be recharged with topically-applied fluoride. They tend, however, to discolor over time. In another attempt to “better” the glass ionomer restorative materials, compomers were also developed. They were touted as being similar to glass ionomers but having much better esthetics and being easier to place and polish. Unfortunately, some of the manufacturer’s claims were not confirmed by published research. Although they handled better than GICs, they released much less fluoride and could not be recharged.
In the continuing quest for improved glass ionomer-like restoratives, manufacturers have developed and introduced a new class of materials called “giomers.” As noted earlier, the term implies they are combinations of glass ionomers and composites. Their manufacturers claim they have properties of both glass ionomers (fluoride release, fluoride recharge) and resin composites (excellent esthetics, easy polishability, biocompatibility). Giomers are distinguished by the fact that, while they are resin-based, they contain pre-reacted glass-ionomer (PRG) particles. The particles are made of fluorosilicate glass that has been reacted with polyacrylic acid prior to being incorporated into the resin. The pre-reaction can involve only the surface of the glass particles (called surface pre-reacted glass ionomer or S-PRG) or almost the entire particle (termed fully pre-reacted glass ionomer or F-PRG). Giomers are similar to compomers and resin composites in being light activated and requiring the use of a bonding agent to adhere to tooth structure. Only one giomer is commercially available at the time of this writing, Shofu’s Beautiful, (see at right) which uses the S-PRG technology. According to Shofu, Beautiful is indicated for restoring Class I through V lesions as well as for treating cervical erosion lesions and root caries. It is available in 13 shades and is supplied in syringes.
Little published research is available on the properties or performance of giomers. One recently published study compared the fluoride release of a glass ionomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer, a giomer, and a compomer. It found that while the giomer released fluoride, it did not have an initial “burst” type of release like glass ionomers, and its long-term (i.e., 28-day) release was lower than that of the other materials.1 Another study found that a giomer, after polishing with Sof-Lex disks, had a smoother surface than a glass ionomer, and one that was comparable to that of a compomer and a resin composite.2 A three-year clinical study comparing the performance of a giomer with that of a microfill resin composite in Class V erosion/abrasion/abfraction lesions has also been done. After measuring eight performance characteristics, no significant differences between the two materials were found.3
Almost assuredly, many other giomer products will become available in the future.
14/07/2010 at 12:37 pm #14018divyansheeOfflineRegistered On: 24/04/2010Topics: 25Replies: 38Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times14/07/2010 at 12:59 pm #14019Anonymous14/07/2010 at 7:36 pm #14020tirathOfflineRegistered On: 31/10/2009Topics: 353Replies: 226Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 times15/07/2010 at 7:04 am #14021sushantpatel_docOfflineRegistered On: 30/11/2009Topics: 510Replies: 666Has thanked: 0 timesBeen thanked: 0 timesGlass ionomers or “giomers†are resin composites used in restorative dentistry to save the teeth from decay and damage. These materials release fluoride and resemble our natural tooth color. A number of applications in the field of dentistry have been identified for which these materials can be effectively used. After their introduction in 1972, many types of glass ionomers have been produced which can be used for different purposes. Giomers are actually a combination of the original glass ionomers and composite materials. They are also known as resin-modified glass ionomers which can be used for filling and bonding.
There are five types of glass ionomers which have been classified according to their physical and chemical properties. These types are, conventional glass ionomer cements, resin-modified glass ionomers, hybrid ionomers, tri-cure glass ionomers, and metal-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Dentists prefer hybrid and resin-modified glass ionomers over traditional ionomers because they set faster and have high viscosity. A number of other factors can be considered when making a choice among different types of giomers available out there. In some types of ionomers finer glass particles are used which make them better suited to a number of applications. A high powder-to-liquid ratio is another desirable property in glass ionomers.
Resin-modified and hybrid glass ionomers are light-cured systems in which the acid-base reaction is supported by resin polymerization for faster setting. They are also known as dual-cured glass ionomer cements because of this reason. These giomers are popular for their strength and translucency. Light-activated hybrid glass ionomers are superior to the conventional ones because of their setting properties. It has also been found that hybrid materials are more radiopaque than other types of glass ionomers. Many of the resin-modified glass ionomers save time and are ideal for patients who are intolerant of treatments that take a long time to complete.
Another benefit of hybrid and resin-modified glass ionomers is that they are available in a number of esthetic shades. Furthermore, they are prepared according to the triple curing technology which includes self-curing, light curing and glass ionomer curing. Some giomers are selected based on their excellent mechanical properties, while others are chosen due to their good physical properties. Tri-cure glass ionomers are the strongest of all giomers because they are prepared by incorporating a third polymerization reaction in addition to the acid-base and photo-initiation reactions. They can be used in cases where opaque structures are involved.
Metal-reinforced glass ionomers are prepared by adding silver-amalgam alloy powder to the conventional giomers to increase radiopacity and physical strength. These materials have very low esthetic value and therefore are not widely used in dental procedures. The final color of all these types of glass ionomers depends on the polishing technique used by the dentist. Some of them tend to discolor after a period of time; however, all of them have incomparable physical strength and high retention rate. Some disadvantages of glass ionomers include abrasion, sensitivity to water during setting stage, and less esthetic appeal than traditional resin composites.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.