what are ORMOCERS???????

Home Forums Endodontics & conservative dentistry what are ORMOCERS???????

Welcome Dear Guest

To create a new topic please register on the forums. For help contact : discussdentistry@hotmail.com

Currently, there are 0 users and 1 guest visiting this topic.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #9641
    Anonymous
    Online
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 1149
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 1 time

    ORMOCER stand for ORganically Modified CERamic. It is a three dimensionally cross-linked copolymer.
    Ormocer are advanced filling materials for use in dentistry which, due to their innovative matrix technology and filler particles represent state-of-the-art science. The Ormocer class of materials was developed by the Fraunhofer Silicate Research Institute at Wurzburg, Germany and is patented.
    The Ormocer structure consists of a special pre-shaped copolymeric network. Unlike conventional polymers, Ormocers have a large back bone, which is functionalized with polymerizable organic units. This produces three-dimensional polymeric composites. Filler particles are incorporated into this cross-linked inorganic and organic network matrix. Ormocers are fully polymerised materials.
    Ormocers undergoes 1.97% volume shrinkage which is lowest value recorded so far for a resin based filling material. Due to their cross-linking and chemical nature, Ormocers ensure that it is a highly biocompatible filling material.
    Their advantages compared to conventional composites are: outstanding biocompatibility, minimal shrinkage, resistance to masticatory loading and esthetics resembling natural teeth. It is virtually impossible to differentiate between teeth filled with Ormocers and caries-free, non-filled natural teeth.

    #14317
    Anonymous

    what are the brand names in India ? who are the dealers ?

    veeren

    #14318
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Ormocers are making rounds in the dental circuit for quite some time now..would like to know more about it..

    #14319
    gaurang_thanvi2003
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/11/2009
    Topics: 41
    Replies: 83
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    Cost per Unit And time period ?????

    #14320
    Anonymous

    Commerically two types of ormocers are available: Admira and Definite
    Manufacturer of Admira is Voco, Germany and of Definite is Degussa, Hanau, Germany. Ormocers are available in mumbai, banglore.
    Admira with its bonding agent cost around Rs 8,000/-.

    #14321
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    So are these two different types of ormocers or the same ones under different brand names?

    #14322
    Anonymous

    These ormocers differ in their composition but their proprties are almost similar. Admira is a hybrid ormocer which contain 56% filler (by volume) and Definite is a small particle ormocer which contain 60.2% fillers.

    #14323
    Anonymous

    How does ORMOCERS appear radiographically?

    #14324
    sushantpatel_doc
    Offline
    Registered On: 30/11/2009
    Topics: 510
    Replies: 666
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    They ought to have a radio-opaque component to make them visible on a radiograph..

    #14325
    Anonymous

    they appear radiopaque in radiographs….

    #15621
    nidhi
    Offline
    Registered On: 19/06/2012
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 1
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

     COST OF ORMOCER

     

    #15627
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

     Admira is a light polymerizing, ormocer-based restorative material. It contains three-dimensional polymerizable inorganic-organic polymer chains and aliphatic and aromatic dimethacrylate. The resin matrix of Admira consists of ormocer, Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA. It contains 78% inorganic filler, glass ceramic, and SiO2 particles of 0.7 μm, and it polymerizes under halogen light [9]. In this study, the Admira bond is compared with the other fifth and six generation materials to demonstrate if these adhesive systems can be used as alternative adhesives to the Admira bond when depleted.

    The results of this study showed that the Admira bond had the highest bond strength for both enamel and dentin followed by the Prime & Bond NT with no significant difference between the two adhesives when they were applied to enamel and with significant difference when they were applied to dentin. Prime & Bond NT is related to the Etch & rinse system and has nanofilled, fluoride-releasing character. The nanofiller may improve the adhesive strength to both enamel and dentin and sufficient film thickness from one-coat, one-cure technique. The nanofiller particles are less than one hundredth of the average diameter of dentinal tubules at enamel-dentin junction (0.8 μm), and therefore they are fully capable of entering the tubules and the demineralized zone of the dentin. The nanofiller serves as an additional cross-link and therefore strengthens the adhesive layer [10, 11]. It was concluded that nanoparticle hydroxyapatite particles, produced by hydrothermal routes, were used to infiltrate sections of human dentine. The effect of the particles in blocking the channels in dentine in order to prevent fluid motion was shown. In the long term, this approach may offer an effective means of treating sensitive teeth [12]. Particles prepared at pH 12 had a mean length of approximately 70 nm and diameter of approximately 30 nm. These showed the most promising infiltration results, with up to 90% of the tubules being fully or partially occluded [13]. In the present study, these properties explain the recorded cohesive mode of failure of the Admira bond. The viability of the SEM technique for the 3D characterization of dentine tubule structure was considered. It has shown the capability to capture the complex structure and interconnection in a porous insulating biological tissue with nanoscale resolution, but over volumes covering thousands of cubic micrometres [14].

    The lowest shear bond strength was recorded for Prompt-L-Pop with both of enamel and dentin. Prompt-L-Pop is related to the self-etching, one-step adhesive system. This result may be attributed to the effectiveness of self-etching primer systems on properly etching the enamel which also reflected on the adhesive mode of failure of this type of adhesive. Etching of enamel by self-etching primer is less predictable than that of phosphoric acid etching. Removal of smear layer by a separate etching step before bonding would produce a more reliable and durable bond to dentin [15]. Excite and AdheSE exhibited an intermediate shear bond strength with significant difference from the Admira bond and Prime & Bond NT adhesives.

    Admira bond is a specific formulated primer/adhesive ormocer-based, light-curing system for enamel and dentin bonding. It was reported that Admira bond contains special adhesive ormocer with calcium complexing functionality which enhances the bond strength on tooth structure. Because of the chemical affinity, Admira bond adheres firmly to both the tooth structure and the restorative material. This explains the cohesive mode of failure of the Admira adhesive system [9]. Ormocer-based composite should be used with the matching specially formulated primer/adhesive system, and the practitioner is cautioned not to indiscriminately exchange specific dentin bonding agents for nonspecific ones. This conclusion is somewhat in conflict with the results of our study which indicated that ormocer could be used with nonspecific primer/adhesive system, this may be attributed to the difference in the adhesives used. The researchers in that study used nonspecific self-etching adhesive in addition to specific primer/adhesive for studying microleakage not the bond strength [16].

    The bond strength of Prime & Bond NT and that of Excite adhesive to enamel was significantly different. This result may be attributed to the chemical composition of the adhesives. Although both types of adhesives are nanofilled and alcohol based, Prime & Bond NT is acetone based while Excite is ethanol-based adhesive but Prime & Bond NT contains two different types of resins, T-Resin (small, cross-linked molecule) and D-Resin (small, mobile resin molecule). These types of resins enhance resin infiltration compared to Excite adhesive; this explains the significant difference between the bond strength obtained with Prime & Bond NT and Excite adhesives to enamel. Adhesives that use acetone as the solvent may require a moist dentin substrate to produce adequate bonding [17]. Also, these factors control the behavior of these adhesive during debonding.

    #16065
    Drsumitra
    Offline
    Registered On: 06/10/2011
    Topics: 238
    Replies: 542
    Has thanked: 0 times
    Been thanked: 0 times

    This study was designed to investigate the effect of storage in water on bonding efficacy to enamel and dentin of four resin-modified (Dyract, De Trey Dentsply; Fuji II LC, GC Dental Corp.; Photac Fil, ESPE; Vitremer, 3M Dental Products), one conventional glass ionomer filling material (Ketac Fil, ESPE) and a resin composite system (Pekafill/Gluma bonding system, Bayer). The hypothesis was that water storage would lead to an adverse effect on bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements to enamel and dentin.
    METHODS:
    The shear bond strength of each material was determined after storage periods of 24 h, 1 wk, 1 mon, 3 mon and 6 mon. The data were subjected to one-way ANOVA. Significant differences were determined by multiple comparison testing (significance level 5%). The failure modes of the debonded specimens were analyzed with a dissecting microscope.
    RESULTS:
    Shear bond strengths to enamel for Dyract, Photac Fil and Pekafill were 5.2 +/- 1.3, 9.9 +/- 1.6 and 17.0 +/- 2.3 MPa, irrespective of storage time (p > 0.05). For Ketac Fil, the average shear bond strength between 1 wk and 6 mon was 4.5 +/- 1.7 MPa, the mean value for Fuji II LC between 24 h and 3 mon was 10.3 +/- 3.9 MPa and after 6 mon was 19.8 +/- 4.4 MPa, while Vitremer showed increasing shear bond strengths between 24 h (2.4 +/- 0.8 MPa) and 1,3 and 6 mon (13.8 +/- 4.3 MPa). Shear bond strengths to dentin were not adversely affected by storage throughout the 6 mon for Dyract (13.0 +/- 2.6 MPa), Fuji II LC (12.7 +/- 1.7 MPa) and Pekafill (14.6 +/- 3.1 MPa), when tested by ANOVA (p > 0.05). Ketac Fil showed 4.9 +/- 1.2 MPa between 1 wk and 6 mon and lower shear bond strength after 24 h. The average shear bond strengths up to 1 mon for Vitremer were 5.4 +/- 2.5 MPa (p > 0.05). However, at 3 and 6 mon immersion in water, three specimens had loosened spontaneously. With Photac Fil, no adhesion to dentin was registered. Most samples showed cohesive failure patterns in the restorative materials. Adhesive or mixed failures were registered only for Vitremer on dentin and enamel up to 1 wk and for Dyract on enamel.
    SIGNIFICANCE:
    Long-term water storage generally had no adverse effect on bonding efficacy of resin-modified glass ionomer cements to dentin and enamel.

     

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.